Editorial summary: Missouri | Rock hill herald
St. Joseph News-Press. December 3, 2021.
Editorial: Another way to supply the chain
Nestled in the middle of the country, Missouri has the seventh largest mile-long network of freeways to maintain. The nearest container port to the Pacific Ocean is approximately 1,600 miles away.
In the face of this logistical reality, it made perfect sense for Governor Mike Parson to join a multi-state effort to lighten the bureaucratic bureaucracy that truckers might find as frustrating as a pothole section of Interstate 70. L Operation Open Roads Initiative aims to lower the age requirement for a commercial driver’s license from 21 to 18 and reduce other regulations that contribute to supply chain bottlenecks.
Critics believe trucking companies should overpay drivers and the problem is solved. But the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics says the average truck driver’s salary is $ 47,000 per year, which isn’t bad pay for a job that doesn’t require a post-secondary degree. . This suggests that the problem isn’t paying as much as the long hours and time away from home and family.
There is another solution to this problem, a long term solution that involves technology. It has already been rejected but deserves reconsideration given the supply chain issues.
In 2016, Governor Jay Nixon vetoed a bill that would have allowed a technology called the Truck Platoon. Three years later, State Senator Dan Hegeman again attempted to legislate to allow it, but the effort was unsuccessful.
The Vehicle Platoon is an adaptive cruise control that allows commercial trucks equipped with cameras, radars and advanced software systems to come close to each other and achieve fuel economy through the aerodynamic hood of the lead truck.
As proposed, the legislation would have required a driver in the lead and tail vehicles, although many see this as a step towards autonomous trucking, especially in the second vehicle, as technology evolves.
Nixon rejected this for safety reasons (he also took money to fund the Teamsters Union campaign), but if the state is willing to let 18-year-old drivers behind the wheel of a big rig- form, maybe now is the time to embrace technology that doesn’t mind long hours and time away from home.
Time will tell if the people will accept this. Automation would help ease the bottleneck at container ports, but the International Association of American Longshoremen has long hesitated. The union will not serve automated vessels operating without a crew, although this will speed up supplies.
So we wait for the longshoreman to unload the ship and the 18-year-old trucker to bring the products to the warehouse and finally to the consumer. We have seen how it goes sometimes.
Americans, who aren’t known to be particularly patient, could embrace more automation if this supply chain bottleneck persists.
Saint-Louis post-expedition. December 5, 2021.
Editorial: Strickland Case Shows Why Missouri Compensation Law Needs A Rewrite
The exoneration of Kevin Strickland, who spent nearly 43 years in prison for murders he did not commit, highlighted the cruel cynicism of Missouri political leaders, with the governor and attorney general refusing to correct this injustice for political reasons. It also highlights an injustice in Missouri law, which does not allow compensating those wrongly imprisoned unless DNA evidence is part of their exemption.
It’s an insane standard that ignores a situation like Strickland’s, in which even prosecutors now recognize his innocence. The law should be updated to compensate any jailed Missourian who has been wrongly convicted. Conservative lawmakers should be the first to recognize the blatant injustice and the need for fair compensation when the state deprives an innocent person of their life or liberty.
Strickland, who is black, was convicted of a triple murder in Kansas City in 1978 by an all-white jury despite the lack of physical evidence linking him to the crime. Two men who confessed said Strickland, 18 at the time, was not involved. The shotgun used in the murders had someone else’s print on it. The only witness to put Strickland at the scene then recanted, saying he was not there and that she had been pressured by police to name him.
None of this moved Governor Mike Parson, who refused Strickland’s pardon, saying his case was not a “priority” – unlike, apparently, the case of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple from St Louis Parson has pardoned for their gun antics towards protesters marching past their homes in 2020.
He also failed to displace state attorney general Eric Schmitt. He parted ways with his politically-inspired prosecutions of responsible pandemic policies long enough to launch a politically-inspired attempt to keep Strickland jailed, claiming he remained convinced of Strickland’s guilt even though those who did have actually sued say he’s innocent. It doesn’t seem like the price is too high for Schmitt to get that seat in the US Senate he covets.
A judge did what Parson and Schmitt wouldn’t and freed Strickland. Missouri law provides compensation of $ 50 per day of imprisonment for inmates who are found to be genuinely innocent (as opposed to convictions overturned for technical reasons) – but such compensation is only available when DNA testing is responsible. of the exemption. Since there is no DNA test that can prove someone was not at a crime scene, Strickland is denied the over $ 765,000 Missouri would have otherwise owed him for those wasted years.
The fact that Strickland received over $ 1 million in donations through a GoFundMe campaign to reclaim his life is an encouraging statement on society today. But the fact that such a route was necessary in the absence of fair compensation from the state should be a humiliation for every Missourian and a motivation to change this law.
Kansas City Star. December 3, 2021.
Editorial: Buen trabajo: Missouri AG Schmitt succeeded in putting migrants more at risk
Cruelty, it seems, is the goal of Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, whose hands are all over the heightened risks migrants face. You see, the attorney general is running for the United States Senate.
It was his quest for headlines that led to lawsuits like the one he filed in conjunction with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to revive a dangerous migration policy implemented by former President Donald Trump and quashed by the Biden administration.
A Texas judge agreed, so this particular humanitarian fiasco will be in effect again as of Monday.
“Staying in Mexico” forces asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while they seek protection here.
More than 1,500 cases of kidnapping, rape, torture and other abuses against migrants returned to Mexico have been reported as a direct result of this policy, according to advocacy group Human Rights First.
Many are targeted by organized gangs. Remember the tent camp along the Rio Grande at Matamoros where asylum seekers were traumatized by flooding, freezing and extortion?
Schmitt, of course, sees the court ruling as something to celebrate: “After we sued Biden’s administrator and obtained a court order demanding the re-application of President Trump’s ‘Stay in Mexico’ policy – until to #SCOTUS – program success is now being restored, ”read a post on Schmitt’s official Twitter profile. “This is a huge victory for border security! #BidenBorderCrisis.
One man’s “successful program” and “huge victory” is literally another’s funeral.
The Biden administration is trying to mitigate the damage by broadening the definition of vulnerable migrants.
But the decision to relaunch the program puts thousands of lives at risk. This is a “huge victory” for Schmitt as he believes his cruelty will be rewarded by voters in next year’s election.